lord_whimsy ([info]lord_whimsy) wrote,
@ 2008-05-06 10:27:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:ill-considered notions

THE WIFE-TO-PLANET INDEX
I've been very busy this week, but as I finish illustrations and clear out wild brush in the back yard, I've been thinking about the offshoot sects of Mormonism that have been in the news of late. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I gather from various sources that, according to the beliefs of these sects, the more wives a man has, the larger the planet he gets to rule after he dies. Assuming that's true, I think these true believers may have overlooked one crucial element: gravity.

Let's say that the Mormon fundamentalist fellow in question leads an exemplary life as it is defined by his beliefs; he amasses wives and offspring like so many box top coupons, then shuffles off his mortal coil. Will he then find that, after cashing in his chattel, the massive planet he is heir to has such a strong gravitational pull that all he can do in the afterlife is lie on his back, do his best to breathe and dream of one day managing to lift a toothpick?

And what exactly is the correlation between number of wives and size of planet? Is there a table somewhere, a point system? How many wives would one need to hit that 'sweet spot' needed for an Earth-like Class M planet? One too many, and you could find yourself eternally buffeted about like a feather by the 300 mph winds of a gas giant's ammonia-rich atmosphere (Perhaps those wind-catching dresses their ladyfolk wear are a contingency?) One wife too few, and you could wind up on a cold, tiny lump of frozen methane, evermore wishing you had been more of a cuddler.

And is there a correlation between number of children and the amount of moons you get? And where do comets figure in all this? Are they visiting relatives? And what do you have to do to get a ring around your planet? Is that a bonus of some sort, like for perfect church attendance or generous tithing?

~W



(Post a new comment)


[info]the_new_lemon
2008-05-06 03:09 pm UTC (link)
After having lived on this particular planet for the past x years, I fail to see the point of repeating the experience elsewhere.

I prefer the afterlife doctrine of the Jehovah's Witnesses: heaven for the believers and non-existence for everyone else.

Such an easy choice!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]jc_marketing
2008-05-08 07:11 pm UTC (link)
Actually, rulership in heaven for the 144000 descendants of the 12 original tribes of man destined to lead perfect lives and lead us. Paradise on earth for believers, non-existence for the rest. But close enough I suppose. Unfortunately I grew up in a JW household...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]maps_or_guitars
2008-05-06 03:11 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps, too, the average age of the wives has an effect on the age of the planets. Let the old ladies get too old, and your planet might be an inert rock like mars. Too young, and you get an unstable, volcanic hell (!) with an ill-developed, carbon dioxide/methane/carbon monoxide/ammonia atmosphere to spend your afterlife in. WHEE.

So your funda-mormon with a harem of pre-teens might be able to look forward to bone-jellying gravity, earthquakes, lava flows, no oxygen at all, and a positively Venereal case of global warming. SWEET.

(Reply to this)


[info]unprotoize
2008-05-06 03:28 pm UTC (link)
Silly Whimsy. Gravity of course is only a theory. Good Christian soldiers adhere and ascribe to the Intelligent Falling.

(Reply to this)


[info]turkishb
2008-05-06 03:39 pm UTC (link)
I think the formula is related to the virgins and fountains in paradise gig. I'm sure god has a chart with all this laid out, like an insurance plan.

(Reply to this)


[info]poetry_lady
2008-05-06 03:52 pm UTC (link)
This, good sir, is pure poetry. Thank you for enriching my morning! So glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks down these sorts of paths to their illogical conclusions.

(Reply to this)


[info]trini_naenae
2008-05-06 05:20 pm UTC (link)
You managed to make that entire mess funny. For that, I give you my thanks.

(Reply to this)


[info]tutubird
2008-05-06 07:35 pm UTC (link)
Aye you have given me a fit of giggles and one more thing to ponder while distracting myself from more pressing tasks. Cheers to that . . .

(Reply to this)


[info]thomascott
2008-05-07 09:06 pm UTC (link)
How the mind wanders midst brush-clearing...

(Reply to this)


[info]willowfinn
2008-05-08 04:49 am UTC (link)
Lord High Whimsy, Eschatological Comedian. :)

(Reply to this)


[info]jc_marketing
2008-05-08 07:15 pm UTC (link)
Ah but you yourself have overlooked one crucial element: Magick! Remember that we're dealing with a group that believe that a single all-powerful being simply whooshed everything into existence with a wave of his hand and then proceeded to dominate our lives with tons intricate and often contradicting rules! If you've accepted this leap of logic, then believing that the afterlife is a suitable planet that is perfect and earth-like (or that you will somehow possess the ability to withstand the extreme gravity or density of the atmosphere) isn't much farther to go.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…